Microsoft released a new Windows Insider build of Windows 11 to its experimental Dev Channel today, with a fairly extensive batch of new features and tweaks. But the most important one for enthusiasts and PC administrators is buried halfway down the list: This build removes a command prompt script called bypassnro, which up until now has been a relatively easy and reliable way to circumvent the otherwise mandatory Microsoft Account sign-in requirement on new Windows 11 PCs and fresh installs of Windows 11 on existing PCs.

Microsoft's Windows Insider Program lead Amanda Langowski and Principal Product Manager Brandon LeBlanc were clear that this change is considered a feature and not a bug.

"We’re removing the bypassnro.cmd script from the build to enhance security and user experience of Windows 11," Langowski and LeBlanc write in the post. "This change ensures that all users exit setup with internet connectivity and a Microsoft Account."

Read full article

Comments

President Trump and administration officials claimed this week that no classified information about war plans was shared with a journalist, despite The Atlantic report that specific plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen were included in a Signal chat the reporter was inexplicably invited to.

The Atlantic initially declined to publish the exact text of the most specific message sent in advance of the bombings but changed course after the Trump administration's denials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters that "nobody was texting war plans and that’s all I have to say about that." At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said that "there was no classified material that was shared in that Signal group."

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said at the same hearing that "my communications, to be clear, in the Signal message group were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information." Trump himself said the information shared was not classified.

Read full article

Comments

Italy’s war on pirate IPTV providers, resellers, and viewers, began in earnest back in February 2024. Yet despite the significant resources committed to the expanding Piracy Shield initiative, it’s all but invisible to the public.

Piracy Shield’s existence, not unlike that of a cosmic black hole, is perhaps most easily confirmed by observing the effect it has on the entities that surround it. After drawing in every ISP in the country, each required to block pirate sites within 30 minutes at their own expense, legal amendments recently expanded the potential for new recruits. VPN providers, DNS operators, hosting companies, and other blocking-capable entities, can now be compelled to participate in a piracy war with no obvious end.

Both Cloudflare and Google have faced considerable pressure to participate voluntarily. Once it became clear that was unlikely to happen, telecoms regulator AGCOM began openly criticizing the companies’ refusal to implement blocking measures. Just below the surface, both were already becoming entangled in uncompromising anti-piracy legislation, specifically designed to ensure that intermediaries have no other choice.

Cloudflare Falls First

In a decision handed down last December, the Court of Milan ordered Cloudflare to block pirate streaming services offering Serie A football matches. The Court found that Cloudflare’s CDN, DNS resolver, WARP, and reverse proxy service, facilitate access to live pirate streams.

The Court spoke of “causal contribution” to copyright infringement and the undermining of Italy’s ‘Piracy Shield’ legislation. With its finding that refusal to take action established legal responsibility for the self-described online intermediary, the Court warned that further refusal to block would be addressed with fines of €10,000 per day.

Serie A Complaint Triggers Action Against Google

In a lawsuit filed at the Court of Milan, Serie A complained that Google refused to comply with requests to block pirate sites for which AGCOM had issued blocking instructions.

In a statement published Thursday, AGCOM Commissioner Massimiliano Capitanio claims that not only did Google fail to respect those orders, but it also took no action to address content previously listed for blocking on the Piracy Shield system.

Published on LinkedIn, Capitanio’s statement references a decision handed down on March 11 by the Court of Milan, which reportedly clarifies that all relevant internet access providers, including Google, must respect the requirements of law n. 93/2023.

The Court’s decision wasn’t made available to support AGCOM’s statement, and at the time of writing, we are still trying to locate a copy. Whether it contains any additional information is unknown but as things stand, the reporting suggests a landslide defeat for Google and praise all round for AGCOM’s work.

The Decision, According to AGCOM

Capitanio’s assessment notes that Google is subject to EU regulations concerning digital services. As a result, the company is also required to comply with requests for blocking measures issued on an “urgent basis in order to counteract illicit activities carried out by recipients of services, where those services causally contribute” to rights violations.

“It is therefore reiterated, as already noted in the December [2024] order against Cloudflare, that when AGCOM determines that certain content violates copyright, any service that contributes to the distribution of that content must comply with [AGCOM’s] decisions,” Capitanio adds.

“In ordering the execution of the blocks, with a precise reconstruction of the legislation, the Judge therefore confirmed the value of AGCOM’s investigations, once again giving legitimacy to a system for the protection of copyright that is unique in the world.”

One-Sided Decision

Since AGCOM has clashed quite fiercely with both Cloudflare and Google over blocking and related issues during the last 12 months, any defeat for Google will likely be considered a win for the regulator. This brings us to another important aspect of the announcement.

After Serie A receives praise from AGCOM, it becomes evident that Google has not yet had an opportunity to defend its position.

“The validity of Serie A’s requests seem so clear that the provision was issued inaudita altera parte, that is, without even needing to hear from Google, which will obviously bring its defense in view of the hearing that will have to confirm the provision,” Capitanio notes.

To use a football analogy, Serie A appears to be leading four-nil after the first leg, but has yet to face any opposition. More detail on the specifics of the procedure may yet prove informative but until then, Google is clearly being identified as the loser.

“The Court reminds the American company, as it already did with Cloudflare, that no one should even unwittingly favor crimes related to piracy. The road to full legality is still a long one, but these are fundamental steps forward,” Capitanio concludes.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.